Return-to-office policies need nuance, says expert
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES — Recruiting Brainfood newsletter founder Hung Lee believes that the ongoing debate over return-to-office mandates often overlooks crucial differences among employee types.
Lee argues that debates should not lump together distinct employee groups with varying needs and circumstances.
Younger employees, often seeking growth and connection with coworkers, tend to benefit from an in-person work environment. Conversely, many senior employees, particularly those with children, may find working from home more effective.
The current discourse needs to factor in these nuances, Lee suggests.
“We’ve treated things monolithically… But we’re probably at the point now where we need to bring in the nuance because what is positive for one group of people is negative for another.”
He cited a recent survey by iCIMS which revealed that fully remote work held little appeal among university seniors entering the workforce.
Only 2% of them said they wanted such an arrangement. Nearly 60% said they don’t have all the equipment they need at home, and a third said they lack a dedicated workspace. Nearly 90% said they wanted to frequently meet in person with coworkers to build relationships and network.
On the other hand, companies that were remote-first before the pandemic often targeted experienced senior workers who had already built social capital and had efficient home workspaces.
Lee observes an emerging tension as some companies roll back remote policies, hinting at a power shift back to employers.
He suggests companies must consider the demographic makeup of their workforce when designing organization strategies, particularly regarding remote work policies.
