Cutting junior jobs for AI is ‘dumb’: AWS CEO

MUMBAI, INDIA — Amazon is hiring 11,000 interns and recent graduates in 2026, with AWS CEO Matt Garman calling the industry trend of cutting entry-level roles to offset AI costs ‘one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard,’ Indian Express reports.
Junior talent is the idea pipeline — and Amazon is treating it that way
“If you have no talent pipeline that you’re building and no junior people that you’re mentoring and bringing up through the company, we often find that that’s where we get some of the best ideas,” said Garman.
Amazon’s commitment to the thesis is reflected in its own data: the company employs more software developers today than it did two years ago, despite the widespread adoption of AI coding tools.
Amazon’s 11,000-person intern and graduate program directly contradicts the narrative that AI productivity gains justify cutting junior headcount — and Garman says companies following that logic are creating a talent void they cannot reverse.
AI will reshape white-collar work — but reshape and eliminate are not the same
“I do think that half of white-collar jobs may change, but wipe out and change are different,” said Garman — drawing a distinction he positioned as foundational to Amazon’s multi-year talent investment thesis.
“At some point that whole thing explodes on itself,” Garman said of organizations that stop hiring junior talent entirely.
The economy argument underpins the talent argument: “If you believe that half of jobs get wiped out, the whole economy collapses on itself,” Garman said, framing runaway job displacement as economically self-defeating rather than a manageable transition.
Amazon’s developer headcount growth and junior hiring plans put it in direct contrast with the 17 companies on TechCrunch’s 2026 AI layoff list that cited AI productivity as justification for workforce reduction.
Garman’s case is not that AI won’t change work — it is that companies optimizing for the short-term labor cost of junior roles are trading the idea pipeline of tomorrow for a marginal efficiency gain today.
For BPO and offshore staffing providers, Garman’s argument maps directly to offshore talent strategy. Providers that stop training junior delivery staff because AI handles what those back-office roles once did are building the same pipeline void — and when clients need judgment, domain expertise, and institutional knowledge, those providers will not have it.
Investing in structured offshore career advancement now is how BPO firms build what AI cannot replicate from scratch.

Independent




